by Angela Sy
And yet, my general notion of volunteering is mixed because several issues remain unresolved after natural disasters pass. I agree that disposing the plastic used for relief goods has its drawbacks. And it's true that some people help only to brag about it. While I felt terrible for the informal settlers who died and whose houses and other belongings were destroyed, they must have been informed at some point that residing too close to bodies of water posed serious threats. Their refusal to relocate then and now doesn't help.
But what bothers me most about volunteerism is its sustainability. True volunteerism is rooted out of compassion. Many people help out; their compassion is enough to take time off of their daily lives . I've observed that many work to help, only to abandon the kind of work once the storms have passed. Must it always take a great calamity to make us more human and aware of others? Wouldn't it be better humanitarianism could be sustained on a more regular basis, so much that volunteering becomes second nature, more permanent, and extended not to just calamities but to other socio-economic causes?
Or is asking such questions asking too much?
I agree with your point that helping out others should be done on a more regular basis, rather than waiting for a storm to remind us of this. However, maybe it's not just about the fleeting sentiments of people. I believe many are actually willing to volunteer on a regular basis, if only they are aware of accessible programs where they can help out. Perhaps if existing programs have better advertising or clearer directions as to how people can help out, many may actually respond. :)
ReplyDelete-Sophia Villasfer
I think that there are others who really volunteer on a regular basis. It's just that volunteer work is more "hyped up" during natural disasters, because of its media presence. Don't get me wrong, I agree that there might be some that only help out during calamities, but maybe because these are the times wherein volunteer and outreach programs are more salient; they are heavily advertised through TV and even social networking sites. These can spark their feelings of compassion and altruism, thus influencing them to help out. However, I do believe that there are others who actively participate in different advocacies; may it be in their churches, NGOs, or school orgs, among others. There are some advocacy groups that are already stable and I believe, already have supporters, such as WWF, PAWS, etc. As for the other advocate groups, maybe if they get more exposure and enough support, they would be sustainable enough in future. Let us not lose hope!
ReplyDeleteRussell Virata
PH101 Sec C