Sunday, June 16, 2013

Soldiers for a Lifetime

by Kathleen Ching

Through time, one’s senses and thoughts are dulled by the mediocrity of Life. One tends to lose sight of purpose and, at some point, fails to endure.Then, Life just floods the lives of different individuals without even filling them. An individual must be both flooded and filled by Life and life.One must not let the strong floods sweep away oneself; else the result is frustration and mediocrity of living. Consider the purpose of life. Everyone must have a reason why they fight, why they walk this life, wielding swords, fighting and pressing on.

What on earth are you fighting for?

If one will let go of purpose, one will be swept away, lose health and die.



“Make your own storyline
Dream as if you will live forever

And live as if you'll die today”
– Lyrics from C.h.a.o.s.m.y.t.h., ONE OK ROCK

Saturday, June 15, 2013

The Transformative Power of Thought

by Alec Abarro

13 June 2013
Discussed text: David Foster Wallace, "This is Water"

The two fishes have been immersed in the water since, well, forever. So when they are asked, “How’s the water?” They are baffled. They haven’t been on land, or at least felt the air. How can they be aware of the water when it is so constant? It has always been there, engulfing them. The older fish must have experienced jumping out of the water, and felt the breeze. Or perhaps, he had been washed ashore once upon a time, and felt the soil. Whatever it is, the older fish had been exposed to something that is not water. Hence, he became aware to that something he has been immersed in since forever.

“This is water.”

When we are so absorbed in a paradigm, we involuntarily overlook other ways of seeing the world. The younger fishes aren’t even aware of the water they are stuck in. But the older fish does. More importantly, the older fish knows that there is something other than water. He has seen the sky and the earth. His world is that much bigger.

What about us? What are paradigm are we immersed in? David Foster Wallace calls this “default thinking” and our default thinking is the Me, Myself, and I paradigm. We view the world in our perspective. We literally don’t see the world through another person’s eyes. To us, everything happens in a first person point of view. This I paradigm is our water. Now, the I paradigm is not necessarily bad. But what is does is that it made us more self-centered, more selfish, self-interested, self-involved, self-seeking, self-serving. Self. Consequently, we have, more often than not, overlooked the paradigm of you, of us, of togetherness, of community, of fellowship.

But we are better off than the fish, because humans are gifted with empathy. We have the ability to see ourselves in the place of others. As we distinguish the I from the non-I, we start gaining our own identity. We start to become aware of what we do and who we are by differentiating ourselves with other people.

This non-I thinking partnered with the differentiating of the I from the non-I help us gain a new perspective, another framework to see the world and in turn, the self acts differently as it redraws horizons that transforms the space which it lives in. As we put ourselves in the place of other people, we try getting inside their thoughts and feelings to see what they see and in turn, we identify ourselves with another way of experiencing the world. The ability to empathize not only gives us the capacity to recognize another way of experiencing reality but also gives us the opportunity to objectively judge ourselves from the outside, and this shapes the narratives of our lives.

This is the value of a liberal arts education, as emphasized by David Foster Wallace. It’s about the choice of what to think about, of how to think. But what he really means is “learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience.” Liberal arts free us in the default way of thinking we are stuck in, opening our mind and seeing the world differently. When we change “default thinking,” we gain awareness of the self. We learn how to think. But the most important thing is thinking in order to live fuller.

As we transform from within, the activity for the body changes too. Its actions manifest the inner simulation of the perspectives we have and gained. Simply put, another way of thinking produces another way of acting. It allows us to reach an understanding about the self that causes us to change it and bring about a self-transformation. In the end, an Us paradigm benefits the I, the way I thinks, and acts in the community. The I has changed, but this single individual impacts not only the self but others around him. This is the power of thought.

On Open-Mindedness

by Robert Dominic

13 June 2013
Discussed Text: David Foster Wallace, "This Is Water"

It isn't overthinking if we try and analyze if something happens or occurs for a reason, or simply comes about as pure coincidence. In fact, choosing not to exercise this human capability to seek and define the occurrences around us is a dismissal of this capability, and a submission to our default setting of self-centeredness, that if an ordinary thing that occurs does not strike us immediately as intended for us, we assume it simply happened by pure coincidence.

In the matter of open-mindedness and what is morally right or wrong, the basic truth that is self-evident is that we will all look at one thing with different interpretations. That open-mindedness is not meant to establish what is universally and morally right or wrong, because it is not open-mindedness if the aim or goal is to define, and possibly usurp, what is established in our society and in our world as right and wrong. That does not promote the lessening of arrogance that David Foster Wallace sought to highlight in his commencement speech; if open-mindedness deviates from exploring the truths around us and aims to establish what is right and wrong, then open-mindedness becomes a declaration or a claim, not the intended process of choosing how to think and establishing the control and discipline of what truth and point-of-view to observe.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

An Introduction to the Introduction


by Eve Avila

Today, our house was unusually busy because it was my first day in school. Not to bring my kids to their classrooms but to be the student myself.

Why did I enroll in Philo 101? At 61 years old on my last birthday, I’d say that I have almost completed the joyful journey of living, been there, done that. Now, what do I do with the rest of my life?

I recently returned from a two-year volunteer work in Africa and for the whole time that I was there, I was transported back to my childhood years when life was a struggle. Today, I can see that the meaning of my young life then was for NOW. Then what’s next?


I reckon that I can find the answer if I go back farther and start with the question, Who am I? And by knowing, then perhaps I can create another meaningful chapter in my life – the real meaning of life, in the first place.


Friday, March 15, 2013

You Want It Or You Don't

by Daphne General


“As much as I want to” is a line I’ve heard one too many times. As much as I want to I can’t bring myself to, as much as I want to there’s just no time, as much as I want to I don’t want to hurt you, as much as I want to I should not, etc.

There really is no saying: “as much as I want to”, because if you had wanted to, you would go ahead and do it. If you didn’t want to, then you would say or show that you don’t want it. There really is no in between I want to and I don’t want to, there’s only confusion, grey areas, “I don’t want to now”, pending decisions, etc.

There isn’t any pseudo-wanting something, it’s either you want it or you don’t. And if you don’t want it then I say, “I don’t want it.” Because when you can bring it to the level of speech, you actually make a decision. But saying “as much as I want to” is like staying silent when someone asks you a question, which is worse than answering it with a no.

I think “as much as I want to” is synonymous to falling short of something. Because you never really want it nor not want it. It’s kind of just…there. It’s kind of like IL Y A. There are no decisions, no convictions. But it is not anything and not nothing because you’re left questioning and convincing yourself that you want or don’t want it – and clearly you would not know since the “As much as I want to”s are getting in the way.
And believe me, this is one of the worst things anyone can say to you or you can say to anyone: As much as I want to, because you’ll never know. You’ll never understand it. You’ll never quite be wanted or unwanted. You are just there.

After saying or hearing an “as much as I want to,” you have to pick yourself up from being just “there.” It’s declaring the fact that you want to be wanted or unwanted, you want to be something. That’s the tricky part. It actually going through the full length of saying, “I want to do this” or even “I just don’t want to do this right now.”

So “as much as I want to” doesn’t really help me in any way. I’ll just stick to I WANT TO.

Reply

by Cara Garcia


“There is no period of time longer than waiting for a reply.”

I read this post once from a friend’s Facebook status and I thought of how it’s a riveting way of reiterating the line Doc G said from Albert Camus. Waiting is hell.

It’s true that one of the hardest thing to do is to wait, especially if what you’re waiting for is a response. Human beings as David Foster Wallace said operate on their own default-setting. Once they are in need of information, acknowledgement, things, etc., they want to get hold of it as soon as possible because they need it. It is a very centralized kind of thinking because it seeks the subject’s satisfaction. It is “I” who needs an answer. It is “I” whom you should respond to. It is very totalitarian and it gives us an idea on how this world operates.

Yes, we’re very busy people and we can’t afford to wait. We always have a lot of things going on and tasks to accomplish everyday, and our minds always function in a certain way. I have to pass this paper to Sir Earl today. I have to pay the person I owe soon. I have to finish my part for our group work. But have we ever thought of it this way: Sir Earl needs this paper today. The person I owe needs the money I borrowed soon. My groupmates are relying on me to do this for the team. Why not consider the Other during our everyday struggles? Why not look at things through the Other’s eye?

This precisely describes that occasion when you don’t immediately reply to a text message because you’re busy doing something; and at the end of the day, you suddenly remember it and that’s when you reply. Think about how the person who sent that message needs an answer. S/he, as another “I”, needs to be affirmed by you -- the Other. That’s why a response is a responsibility. The Other is on the line.

We’re always so stuck up with the work piled in front of us, we forget that it’s not us who’s waiting, but rather we are the ones being waited. Tayo ang hinihintay. The Other is waiting for us and if we don’t acknowledge this, they might slip away. The world is waiting for us to do something to sustain it. Our parents are waiting for us to tell them how our day was. Even random people wait for us --- the guy lined up behind you to order coffee, the car at your back waiting for you to park, or your groupmate in a defense panel waiting for you to save his/her ass because s/he can’t answer the panelists’ question.

We should respond to these people. We should consider that these many Others are also “I’s” who need the same things as we do. They also need an answer because for them, waiting is hell too.

I’m Awake Now

by Jason Dacuyan


I am not a morning person. My mind doesn’t really work during mornings. And that is precisely why ever since the first semester, Philosophy has always been a struggle for me. Although 9 am isn’t too early, what usually happens for me is that I sleep so late the night before (average is around 2am to 3am) due to studying or other acads stuff. Or sometimes, I just simply sleep late doing nothing and regret it the next day. Thus, I usually enter Philosophy class with an average of only 4-5 hours of sleep.

Now back to Philo. It’s been very hard for me to concentrate or stay awake in class given my lack of sleep almost every single meeting and our air-conditioned classroom. A lot of my notes don’t form words at all as I wrote them half asleep in class. Now what usually happens for me is that I only read the readings during orals or when we have to write reflection papers. Although in the end, my grades were okay, I think I missed out on a lot when I was half-asleep during the lectures. Aside from not studying, sleepiness is also one big reason why I never raised my hand in class at all since June. I couldn't think straight during class.

Last Christmas break, I wrote the first reflection paper. That was the first time I actually read Levinas and I really liked his philosophy. So sometime during January, I made it a point to actually listen to the remaining philo classes of the semester. However, it was still really hard to change my late sleeping so my solution was caffeine. I now make it a point to always drink coffee (or in worse cases such as having only 3 hours of sleep, I drink Cobra) before philo class in order for me to digest the topic being discussed. As a consequence of my late sleeping, I come to class late, a lot. As proof, 5 out of my 6 cuts (yes, my cuts are maxed out) in philo consist of lates so that’s around 10 lates (I’m usually 5-10 minutes late).

My 6th cut happened around mid-February ad that was my turning point. That meant I could not be late to class anymore. That meant I had to try to sleep earlier. That meant I had to wake up earlier. And, it did work. I was able to at least sleep earlier and have enough sleep for philo class. Thankfully, I was never tardy again or I would’ve been in danger of overcutting. From this turning point, I started to take down notes from lectures and slowly read the Levinas interview and the ring-bound Levinas readings compilation book (the readings are actually really helpful!).

Right now, as we’re about to have our last philosophy class of the semester, I think I’m awake now. Having read and reflected so much these past days on Levinas, I think my il y a is over. And as a side comment, I really think Levinas’ ideas are compelling. Although very idealistic, it sets a good moral foundation for us he explains that we have this infinite responsibility to the Other and other Others that is economic and earthly and is experienced through the epiphany of the Face which is a breakaway from our natural attitude of being “I-centered”. And in simple terms, I think what Levinas is really saying is this: “Be good”. And I really think I am going to carry these ideas my whole life. Oh well, nothing wrong with that.

I guess that ends this entry. I’m awake now.